Friday, July 8, 2016

M6U4A3-TEACHER EVALUATION

TEACHER EVALUATION


Purpose of Teacher Evaluation

The primary goal of teacher evaluation is to help teachers become more effective, ultimately to improve student learning. A 2010 report from NEA’s Professional Standards and Practice Committee summarizes the primary purpose for evaluating teachers:
“The core purpose of teacher assessment and evaluation should be to improve the knowledge, skills, dispositions, and classroom practices of professional educators.”


Current Teacher Evaluation systems

Teacher evaluation systems have been reviewed and revised across the nation in order to improve student learning and to strengthen teachers’ commitment to the profession.


In Ohio, each school district must select either the original or an alternative framework, in which teachers will be evaluated based on two basic areas: educator performance and student growth measures.
Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES)

In the winter of 2009-10, New Haven Public Schools (NHPS) worked closely with the local teachers’ union to design a new evaluation system centered on evidence of student learning. Under the new system, all teachers receive ratings in two overarching categories: “student learning growth,” which reflects student progress on standardized and teacher-generated assessments, and “instructional practice/ professional values,” which reflects regular observations by administrators on factors such as lesson planning and preparation, classroom practice, use of data, professionalism, and high expectations for students. (Teacher Evaluation 2010)



Proposed Elements for Teacher Evaluation

As a new teacher in the field, I believe that evaluation is critical for continuous improvements to the profession. I believe that a fair evaluation system should be multifaceted, multiple measured, and teacher-driven; its data should be regarded in teacher tenure, compensation, development, hiring, promotion and dismissal. I also believe an effective evaluation can motivate effective teachers.

Thus the following elements may be included in an effective and comprehensive teacher evaluation system:

-   Educator Performance: Teachers should be evaluated against clear, rigorous performance expectations based primarily on evidence of student. Expectations should reflect excellence in the classroom, student engagement, as well as academic progress.

-       Classroom observations and Frequent Feedback: instructional coaches, principals, and peer teachers should conduct frequent classroom observations.  They should also have regular conversations with their teachers to discuss overall classroom performance and student progress; professional goals and developmental needs; and the support school leaders will provide to meet those needs. Observations are tied to a clear, detailed and rigorous rubric that focuses on evidence of student learning.


-       Teacher artifacts and Teacher’s Goal-Driven Professional Development Plans: PD plan, lesson plans, curriculum plans, student data records, student work, student formative and summative course evaluation data, minutes from course team-planning meetings, curriculum maps, and teacher reflection notes

-       Teacher self-assessments: it promotes an objective self-reflection of strengths and areas for growth. The reflection should be based on analysis of evidence about effective instructional practices and the impact of those practices on student learning. More importantly, teachers’ input in determining performance and learning outcomes should be part of the evaluation process.


-       Peer review Evaluation: is an ongoing process in which the teacher and peer reviewer examine data, performance and student learning.  The Peer Review Evaluation tool can be used to promote a collaborative relationship between a teacher and his/her peer reviewer. 

-       Student growth data on standardized tests: for tested subject, teachers’ value-added scores can be used to guide efforts to enhance teaching effectiveness if the scores are supplemented with other measures of teaching effectiveness.


-       Student Perception surveys of engagement and motivation: “The advent of student feedback in teacher evaluations is among the most significant developments for education reform in the last decade.” (Timothy Daly, the organization’s president and a former teacher)

-   Teacher contributions to a school or district, such as serving on committees, developing curriculum, mentoring, or engaging community support


As AFT president Randi Weingarten said, teaching is a profession built on the hard work, reflection, care, persistence and intellect of great teachers. We must do everything we can to ensure we protect the profession and provide our students with an education that will truly prepare them for the future.


RESOURCES

Teacher Evaluation: A resource Guide for National Education Association Leaders and Staffs. nea.org

Teacher Evaluation 2010. The New Teacher Project






Friday, July 1, 2016

M6U3A1-High Expectations for Academic Language

Thu Nguyen
Cohort 01/16

High Expectations for Academic Language


Academic Language

Academic language is a meta-language that helps learners acquire the 50,000 words that they are expected to have internalized by the end of high school and includes everything from illustration and chart literacy to speaking, grammar and genres within fields. (8 Strategies for Teaching Academic Language).

Academic language is the language of school and it is used in textbooks, essays, assignments, class presentations, and assessments. (Academic Language and ELLs: What Teachers Need to Know)


Academic Language can be defined as 1) the language used in the classroom and workplace, 2) the language of text, 3) the language of assessments, 4) the language of academic success and 5) the language of power. (Academic Language Function Toolkit-2010)

the idea of "bricks and mortar"


High Expectations and College Level Answers

The use of academic language is more important than ever in preparing students for academic and professional success, particularly in the era of rigorous college- and career-ready standards (such as the Common Core State Standards) that require an increased use of academic language in and across all disciplines. (Academic Language and ELLs: What Teachers Need to Know)


Teachers have an important role to play in supporting your students' academic language development. 

Academic English and social English are not two separate languages. Academic English is more demanding and complex than social English. Learning social English is just the tip of the iceberg. Just because they can speak on the playground, talk to peers, and use everyday English does not mean that they are up to speed in academic English.

(What Is the Difference Between Social and Academic English?)



BICS/CALP

BICS are Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills; these are the "surface" skills of listening and speaking which are typically acquired quickly by many students; particularly by those from language backgrounds similar to English who spend a lot of their school time interacting with native speakers. (Second language acquisition - essential information)


 CALP is Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency. CALP includes language for formal academic learning and for written texts in content areas such as English literature, math, science, and social studies. CALP skills also encompass reading, writing, and thinking about subject-area content material. Students also use CALP skills to compare, classify, synthesize, evaluate, and infer. (Getting Started with English Language Learners by Judie Haynes)


 http://www.educ.ualberta.ca/

RESOURCES

Academic Language Function Toolkit – October 2010)





Friday, June 24, 2016

M6U2A3-Pre-Assessment for Differentiation

Thu Nguyen
Cohort 01/16
Visual Arts – Grade 3
Aboriginal Art

Pre-Assessment for Differentiation


Pre-Assessment

In Visual Arts, Pre-assessment is often taken place in the form of artwork interpretation. The class gathers in a circle, focusing on an artwork projected on the board or a large size print hung on the bulletin board. The question is written on the board and students are given time to Think – Pair – Share/Talk their prior knowledge with the whole class. And that was actually what I already did in this unit.

When I learned about types of questions and assessments and explored tools using technology, I was thinking about making one assessment that can be used either for Pre or Post Assessment. The first type may be simple with multiple-choice or matching questions, targeting on the learning goals defined. The second type may include some personal reflection like self-assessment with essay or short answer types.

I guess constraints in terms of time, pace, and technology concern teachers a lot to design such types of game-like assessments. With Cahoot free version, I found it friendly and easy to use and hopefully my students will feel more interesting and stress-free taking these assessments in Art.

In my own experience, Google Forms are more developed for assessments than Cahoot free version. However, Cahoot is more interesting for young learners with its game-like and visual style. 

Here are the Pre-Assessment I did with Cahoot.




Click this link for a clearer review.



Innovative Differentiation Strategies for Learning Goals

Link to the original chart.
https://www.lucidchart.com/documents/edit/677655b3-96c1-4104-a867-c035f3d0bc60?driveId=0AI8NoojjBBbVUk9PVA#


My differentiation strategies for four defined learning goals are detailed in the below chart.

Students’ participation and engagement is my number 1 target in each lesson I teach. Skill and Knowledge will come along as students are diving into each activity. The below writing will focus on the two groups who are either advanced/ready to apply or limited/need instruction.

1. For "Ready to Apply" group

Learning goal 1: Students are able to identify the identity of Aboriginal culture, belief, and Art.

They are students who answered most, including the most difficult, of the pre-assessment questions correctly, which is equivalent 23% of the class, to keep them challenged and minimize abundance is critical. Know and Share is a good strategy to tap into their prior knowledge by asking them to share verbally with the class what they knew. To challenge them, I will ask them to interpret one artwork hung on the bulletin board and take notes during their explanation for misconception correction at the later stage. To check their contribution to their group reflection on a big poster, I will properly assign different colors of markers.

Learning goal 2: Students are able to understand the meanings of Aboriginal symbols and colors.

In this game-based learning activity, students will make groups of four, play a guessing game with three levels, record their answers on a sheet, check the correctness at the end of each round, and calculate their points. Even though they will play in groups, the points they get somehow similarly with other members in the group, but this activity requires critical thinking and problem solving skills. And this is an innovation in this subject, when students learn through playing.

Learning goal 3: Students are able to understand and experiment dot painting and X-ray technique with different media.

In this hands-on practice, I began the lesson by modeling techniques in a circle. Then students come work in small groups to explore media and practice skills learned. Observation, going-on questions, and Art Critiques are key strategies during this independent practice stage.

Learning goal 4: Students are able to create and illustrate stories collaboratively in groups.

Story map handouts and explicit explanation are important to get students through the expectations. When they sit with their groups, role activation helps students to stay on task and be responsible for their group work. Teacher and students can brainstorm a chart with roles and responsibilities, let students fill what they know about responsibilities of each role and decide to choose the roles they feel comfortable. Students in this group can support their peers in this group project following Peer Helping strategy.


2. For "Need Instruction group" and My Observation

Learning goal 1: Students are able to identify the identity of Aboriginal culture, belief, and Art.

They are students who appear to have limited knowledge about the topic, which is equivalent 23% of the class, to keep them engaged and stimulate their interest for the new topic is my focus. The topic may be new but it must be interesting for them to dive in.

Visual aids are a must. Before the class, I make sure artwork prints hung around the classroom. Following the Know and Share of advanced students, I play a video clip that tells briefly the culture, belief, and life of Australian Aborigines and some authentic artworks. Each new vocabulary or term is introduced with a word card and its explicit definition on the other side of the card. To enrich their understanding about Aborigines, Mobile learning is used as a home exercise. Students will explore more stories on the website http://www.abc.net.au/dustechoes/ and they will come to the next lesson ready and more confident to participate in Dreamtime story telling time.
Recording the lesson allows me to review what I did right or wrong at class, to understand better students in their working places when I was with the others, and to adjust my lesson with the other class and in the next lesson.


Learning goal 2: Students are able to understand the meanings of Aboriginal symbols and colors.

In this game-based learning activity, students will learn from peers when sitting with advanced students. Even they are new with the topic but they enjoy guessing game and can solve simple symbols. The class is very dynamic in this activity. I can tell students are engaged and enjoy learning through play.

Learning goal 3: Students are able to understand and experiment dot painting and X-ray technique with different media.

Some differentiation strategies are ready but I simply do have to use them because the experiment does not seem challenged to this group. Students demonstrate their interest, engagement, and perfectness in creating dot paintings with different media. It proves that hands-on activities and experiments are appropriate for new skills.

Learning goal 4: Students are able to create and illustrate stories collaboratively in groups.

Especially for this group of students, grouping is my strategy to provide the chance for students to learn from their peers. Beside story map handouts and explicit explanation, I spend more time with groups needing more guiding instructions. Observation must be more often when circulating around the class, and taking note should be applied instead of intervention only. Role activation helps students to boost their confidence that they are integral parts of their group and to make sure they have their voice in group’s decision.



In brief, the unit has enriched me in so many ways. I now can be more confident to make assessments with Cahoot or Google Forms, using assessing data for differentiation planning and adapting my teaching in the later stage.


RESOURCES

https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/teach/priorknowledge

http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/dec13/vol71/num04/Differentiation@_It_Starts_with_Pre-Assessment.aspx

http://www.wku.edu/rtwsc/exemplars.php

https://sites.google.com/site/lrtsas/differentiation/5-preassessment-ideas



Friday, June 17, 2016

M6U1A3 - High Stakes Assessments

High Stakes Assessments


High stakes assessments come in many forms and are used for a wide variety of purposes in different countries, schools, districts, and states. The writing below reflects my perspectives on this type of assessments as a teacher and a parent.

Definition:

A high-stakes test is any test used to make important decisions about students, educators, schools, or districts, most commonly for the purpose of accountability—i.e., the attempt by federal, state, or local government agencies and school administrators to ensure that students are enrolled in effective schools and being taught by effective teachers.


High stakes assessments at ICSA

Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) are applied for all students from grade 1 to 10 twice per year. High school seniors, grade 10-12, take SAT plus semester exams twice per year.

The difference between MAP and exams is the time tests are taken place. MAP is often held in the fall and the spring, while exams are administered at the end of each semester.

However, the scores from the above assessments are not used for moving up. In the other words, there is nearly no case of repeating grade. So are no bonuses or rewards given to teachers whose students score high, meaning no test scores is used for teacher evaluations.


Why are high stakes assessments critical for expatriate families?

For expatriate students, MAP scores can be considered as an entry ticket to enroll in international schools. No matter what curricula or standards that students are taught, MAP is a standardized reference for most schools. The computer-based assessment allows students to proceed to next levels. Its objectivity and independence from the school curricula makes it reliable. So far my child has been continuously accepted and placed in appropriate levels in many different schools through this fact-based evidence.


The impact of high stakes assessments critical on students and teachers

For teachers:

In my teaching subject, LS Visual Arts, I do not deal with the pressure of high stakes assessment. But as a Math tutor for some HS students including my son; I definitely feel extremely stressed when there come exams and MAP tests. It is simply because test results, at least in my opinion, may be used for evaluations, reputations, and reliability. Teachers are not the unique factor accountable for test results, students’ effort and family support do. But results must be counted as one important outcome or target of effective teaching.

Some schools in Asian like Vietnam, Singapore, and China where the competition is used as an engagement in teaching and learning, student test results are being factored into teacher evaluations, potentially influencing decisions related to compensation, tenure, hiring, and firing. Recently, many states have changed teacher-evaluation policies and systems to make student test scores a “significant” factor in the evaluation process.

In the States, annual tests for every child in reading and math in grades 3 through 8, plus one in high school, have been a centerpiece of federal education law since 2002. No Child Left Behind, the current incarnation of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, requires them. But this law has been overdue for reauthorization since before President Obama took office.

For students:

If high stakes assessments are the factors to determine whether students will be moved up or promote in their education, these are motivations for students to work harder, learn more, and take the tests more seriously, which can promote higher student achievement.

The positive side is that it establishes high expectations for both educators and students, which can help reverse the cycles of low educational expectations, achievement, and attainment that have historically disadvantaged some student groups, particularly students of color, and that have characterized some schools in poorer communities or more troubled urban areas.

In some countries like Vietnam, India, South Korea, and Scotland, there is a series of high-school-exit/college-entrance exams that are high stakes for students, as well as semester tests, national tests from LS to MS, MS to HS. Imagine how stressful education is in these countries. As a result, there are some cases of painful suicides happening for the youth in India and South Korea.

It calls the urgent attention of policy makers, reformers, and educational leaders in developing new laws, regulations, and school-improvement strategies to ensure the student performance, the future career related, and the test scors.

The reform to Modern Assessments:

National education policy emphasizes a wide range of approaches to assessment, including presentations, performances and reports. Many competitions created as platforms designed to measure higher-order skills like creativity, students' well-being and technological literacy as well as traditional academics, to find and train talents in Math, Science, and Technology.

The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) is a group of states working together to develop a modern assessment that replaces previous state standardized tests. It provides better information for teachers and parents to identify where a student needs help, or is excelling, so they are able to enhance instruction to meet individual student needs.

States can administer PARCC in English language arts/literacy and mathematics for grades 3-8 and high school. The tests are fully accessible and were were developed based on years of research and development. PARCC is computer-based and uses interactive questions to determine whether students have mastered the fundamentals, as well as higher-order skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and analyzing sources to write arguments and informational essays – skills not easily assessed by traditional multiple-choice tests.

The world-class education requires students not only scores at school but also skills for future jobs. Therefore, high stakes assessments should not be the only factor to measure the success of learners.



RESOURCES