Friday, July 8, 2016

M6U4A3-TEACHER EVALUATION

TEACHER EVALUATION


Purpose of Teacher Evaluation

The primary goal of teacher evaluation is to help teachers become more effective, ultimately to improve student learning. A 2010 report from NEA’s Professional Standards and Practice Committee summarizes the primary purpose for evaluating teachers:
“The core purpose of teacher assessment and evaluation should be to improve the knowledge, skills, dispositions, and classroom practices of professional educators.”


Current Teacher Evaluation systems

Teacher evaluation systems have been reviewed and revised across the nation in order to improve student learning and to strengthen teachers’ commitment to the profession.


In Ohio, each school district must select either the original or an alternative framework, in which teachers will be evaluated based on two basic areas: educator performance and student growth measures.
Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES)

In the winter of 2009-10, New Haven Public Schools (NHPS) worked closely with the local teachers’ union to design a new evaluation system centered on evidence of student learning. Under the new system, all teachers receive ratings in two overarching categories: “student learning growth,” which reflects student progress on standardized and teacher-generated assessments, and “instructional practice/ professional values,” which reflects regular observations by administrators on factors such as lesson planning and preparation, classroom practice, use of data, professionalism, and high expectations for students. (Teacher Evaluation 2010)



Proposed Elements for Teacher Evaluation

As a new teacher in the field, I believe that evaluation is critical for continuous improvements to the profession. I believe that a fair evaluation system should be multifaceted, multiple measured, and teacher-driven; its data should be regarded in teacher tenure, compensation, development, hiring, promotion and dismissal. I also believe an effective evaluation can motivate effective teachers.

Thus the following elements may be included in an effective and comprehensive teacher evaluation system:

-   Educator Performance: Teachers should be evaluated against clear, rigorous performance expectations based primarily on evidence of student. Expectations should reflect excellence in the classroom, student engagement, as well as academic progress.

-       Classroom observations and Frequent Feedback: instructional coaches, principals, and peer teachers should conduct frequent classroom observations.  They should also have regular conversations with their teachers to discuss overall classroom performance and student progress; professional goals and developmental needs; and the support school leaders will provide to meet those needs. Observations are tied to a clear, detailed and rigorous rubric that focuses on evidence of student learning.


-       Teacher artifacts and Teacher’s Goal-Driven Professional Development Plans: PD plan, lesson plans, curriculum plans, student data records, student work, student formative and summative course evaluation data, minutes from course team-planning meetings, curriculum maps, and teacher reflection notes

-       Teacher self-assessments: it promotes an objective self-reflection of strengths and areas for growth. The reflection should be based on analysis of evidence about effective instructional practices and the impact of those practices on student learning. More importantly, teachers’ input in determining performance and learning outcomes should be part of the evaluation process.


-       Peer review Evaluation: is an ongoing process in which the teacher and peer reviewer examine data, performance and student learning.  The Peer Review Evaluation tool can be used to promote a collaborative relationship between a teacher and his/her peer reviewer. 

-       Student growth data on standardized tests: for tested subject, teachers’ value-added scores can be used to guide efforts to enhance teaching effectiveness if the scores are supplemented with other measures of teaching effectiveness.


-       Student Perception surveys of engagement and motivation: “The advent of student feedback in teacher evaluations is among the most significant developments for education reform in the last decade.” (Timothy Daly, the organization’s president and a former teacher)

-   Teacher contributions to a school or district, such as serving on committees, developing curriculum, mentoring, or engaging community support


As AFT president Randi Weingarten said, teaching is a profession built on the hard work, reflection, care, persistence and intellect of great teachers. We must do everything we can to ensure we protect the profession and provide our students with an education that will truly prepare them for the future.


RESOURCES

Teacher Evaluation: A resource Guide for National Education Association Leaders and Staffs. nea.org

Teacher Evaluation 2010. The New Teacher Project






Friday, July 1, 2016

M6U3A1-High Expectations for Academic Language

Thu Nguyen
Cohort 01/16

High Expectations for Academic Language


Academic Language

Academic language is a meta-language that helps learners acquire the 50,000 words that they are expected to have internalized by the end of high school and includes everything from illustration and chart literacy to speaking, grammar and genres within fields. (8 Strategies for Teaching Academic Language).

Academic language is the language of school and it is used in textbooks, essays, assignments, class presentations, and assessments. (Academic Language and ELLs: What Teachers Need to Know)


Academic Language can be defined as 1) the language used in the classroom and workplace, 2) the language of text, 3) the language of assessments, 4) the language of academic success and 5) the language of power. (Academic Language Function Toolkit-2010)

the idea of "bricks and mortar"


High Expectations and College Level Answers

The use of academic language is more important than ever in preparing students for academic and professional success, particularly in the era of rigorous college- and career-ready standards (such as the Common Core State Standards) that require an increased use of academic language in and across all disciplines. (Academic Language and ELLs: What Teachers Need to Know)


Teachers have an important role to play in supporting your students' academic language development. 

Academic English and social English are not two separate languages. Academic English is more demanding and complex than social English. Learning social English is just the tip of the iceberg. Just because they can speak on the playground, talk to peers, and use everyday English does not mean that they are up to speed in academic English.

(What Is the Difference Between Social and Academic English?)



BICS/CALP

BICS are Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills; these are the "surface" skills of listening and speaking which are typically acquired quickly by many students; particularly by those from language backgrounds similar to English who spend a lot of their school time interacting with native speakers. (Second language acquisition - essential information)


 CALP is Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency. CALP includes language for formal academic learning and for written texts in content areas such as English literature, math, science, and social studies. CALP skills also encompass reading, writing, and thinking about subject-area content material. Students also use CALP skills to compare, classify, synthesize, evaluate, and infer. (Getting Started with English Language Learners by Judie Haynes)


 http://www.educ.ualberta.ca/

RESOURCES

Academic Language Function Toolkit – October 2010)